In many countries, women are able to join the armed forces now on the equal basis of men. However, some people think only men should be members of the army, navy and air force. Do you agree or disagree?
Stepping into the 21st century, women have embarked on different careers in all walks of life and have become a pivotal role in the world development. However, whether military conscription should only be applicable to men or not has long been debated without conclusive conclusion. As for me, it is my fervent conviction that women merit equal recognition and serious considerations in the military forces.
To commence with, there is a counter-argument that women are physically less advantaged in comparison with men. In this sense, exposure to tough work in the military may plague women and physical injuries are thus well-documented in many cases. However, since human is enjoying one of the greatest technological boom times, advancement in the field of military means that a higher premium is being placed on other skills that women are undoubtedly capable of, not just physical strength. It is evident that women are blessed with intellectual and cognitive skills, which are of enormous importance to the forces. Paradoxically, some women who are qualified are kept out of the military.
Another reason why women should participate in the armed force is rooted in the fact that such move can serve as a spirited fightback against the on-going inequality among men and women. There is no disputing the fact that as life has become increasingly more sophisticated compared to the primitive time, the line between jobs targeted at men and that at women is blurred and should not be made clear-cut. It is no exaggeration to say that entitling a particular task to a subject is unaligned with the philosophy of the contemporary society and can represent a setback in human evolution.
In conclusion, the idea that woman cannot serve in the armed force is inarguably fallacious and unfounded. Conversely, it would, without doubt, be more advisable for military conscription to be based on social, physical and psychological ground, rather than gender.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: ON-GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...rve as a spirited fightback against the on-going inequality among men and women. There i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, may, so, thus, well, as for, in conclusion, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22151898734 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05854062027 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6472194011 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.923076923 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206602815877 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685592437775 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467998118669 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115282328552 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0269095692816 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.