In recent years, there has been a growing concern about whether women should spend more time on their job than their families. This has led to the suggestion that women should be allowed to take maternity leave from their jobs for a few months after they give birth. From my perspective, it is wise to follow this advice as the benefits of this decision outweigh its drawbacks.
Admittedly, there are some disadvantages that women stay at home for a few months after the birth of their baby. For instance, if a pregnant woman does not come to the company after she gives birth, the company will need to find a temporary substitute for the work which might not be easy. Moreover, when mothers return to the work after a few months, they will not get updated with the recent development of their company. In other words, it is hard for them to connect with the previous work.
Despite the disadvantages, there are also some benefits to having maternity leave. For example, if mothers want to stay at home after she gives birth, companies will be able to keep a good member of staff. Given this pregnancy-friendly policy, a large proportion of mothers-to-be, specifically those with a managerial position, do not need to sacrifice their promising careers, and neither do the companies pay a heavy price of losing these gifted employees. Besides, maternity leave can give women a break and enjoy time with their newborn baby without financial concerns, which help mothers to do better in their jobs later.
Considering the positive influences on mothers and their companies, I would argue that the benefits of maternity leave surpass the negatives. Although there are some drawbacks of letting “new mothers” stay at home instead of going to work, there are still many advantages. Given that women have the right to take a rest after giving birth, it is reasonable for them to take maternity leave.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, so, still, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88544891641 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66340615144 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538699690402 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4324793775 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.714285714 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346276221548 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123136648021 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106998834725 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220573231415 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727149379442 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.