The academic success of children lies in numerous factors. Parents, teachers, peers and even internet resources can impact the growth of children. Among those, I think that their classmates determine their success the most.
Though parents can make their children participate in extracurricular lessons to improve their individual abilities, I still view them as a driving force rather than the major contributor to a child’s success. To begin with, students have to interact with each other. They learn how to communicate with each other, and cope with classmates of all personalities. A child’s character is often shaped in an early phase in their learning process, and it’s often difficult to change. For example, a kid who acts like a leader would carry this mentality into later stages in life, standing out among a group and being decisive.
In addition, children share the same learning experience with their classmates and basically have an identical experience with them. They can receive immediate assistance from peers, especially when teachers aren’t around. They also tend to look up to the better ones among their peers. In categories such as learning science, mathematics or exercising, they would view those who are better at respective categories as role models and ask for advice or even replicate their methods in order to enhance themselves.
Furthermore, the competitive nature between classmates cannot be overemphasized. Children always want to be the best among their peers, triggering healthy competition between them. Students don’t like to fall behind, and if they do, they’ll try to catch up. They may be driven into participating in contests or study more diligently due to the intense competition.
In conclusion, classmates affect the success of children the most. Unless the kid is a prodigy that has realized potential, it’s impossible to succeed without classmates. Classmates assist each other, and without them, it’s hard for children to fit into society.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, still, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4076433121 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88425338747 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608280254777 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2645654616 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3684210526 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5263157895 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108845999245 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371460777649 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353153653146 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625246448468 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287226816047 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, still, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 314.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4076433121 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88425338747 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608280254777 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.2645654616 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3684210526 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5263157895 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42105263158 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108845999245 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371460777649 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353153653146 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0625246448468 0.150856017488 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287226816047 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.