many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home. as a result, employees have will have much more flexible working hours in the future.
is this a positive or a negative development?
Plenty of new jobs with different options are available nowadays. Bosses gives opportunity to workers from their home that creates more changeable working time hours for workers. I strongly believe that this has many benefits such as more free times for workers and less stressful working conditions.
On the one hand, if white or blue-collar workers arrange their working times depending on their needs, they will spend more times with their family. In other words, many workers ignore their parent-responsibility against their children and spouse because of hectic labouring hours which means that over working time halts a happy family. A case in point, the mean commuting time from home to work is 2 hours according to the result of study in Harvard University. If labours work in their home, they can save approximately two hours for everyday to spend with their family. Therefore, working at home is a good options to have a fun with children during working at the same time.
Besides, the earnest environment of offices may impoverished if people works at homes. The ambience of a workplace is usually more formal and serious, so labours have to work this anxious and stressful conditions. For instance, the WHO declared that workers experience the stress, a prominent cause of heart disease, while they are in their offices. Hence, working at homes may mitigate the burden of stress in workplaces.
In conclusion, new job fields with flexible timetables and working from homes are options for workers in coming years. In my opinion, tunable working schedules creates more free times and less stressful situations for labours. To put simply, it is a beneficial rights for workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Plenty of new jobs with different options are avai...
^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orkers. I strongly believe that this has many benefits such as more free times ...
^^
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... I strongly believe that this has many benefits such as more free times for wo...
^^
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve that this has many benefits such as more free times for workers and less str...
^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir family. In other words, many workers ignore their parent-responsibility again...
^^
Line 4, column 539, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ey can save approximately two hours for everyday to spend with their family. Therefore, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and stressful conditions. For instance, the WHO declared that workers experience...
^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'right'?
Suggestion: right
...ours. To put simply, it is a beneficial rights for workers.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, hence, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1427.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17028985507 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73063199309 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9655712659 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307923752043 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116904181589 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623074879991 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195550595516 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503966659558 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.