Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?
Historical buildings embody and represent the past marks and fingerprints. Although, in many countries, the buildings are secured by the legal enforcement, some citizens advocate that they should be demolished and new buildings should be erected. This essay will discuss the importance of these buildings and try to find a reply the question that are they really a matter in the way of advance.
On the one hand, ancient buildings are memory of nations, so they might be used for beneficial ways such as tourism rather than destroying them. In other words, to build healthy futures, people should understand their ancestor’s life and experiences, and creates their new generations according to this codes. Furthermore, they can preserve old buildings and open for touristic aims. For example, preserved Chernobyl plants, where people faced the most destructive-environmental disaster of human history, is nowadays flooded by tourist who are interested in to experience the malicious result of radioactivity. Therefore, historical buildings teach some lessons to people who are enthusiastic to visit and learn from these places.
In addition, some historical structures may help the progression itself rather than hindering it. To put simply, scientist use the prior models or ancient structures to develop better ones. A case in this point, according to an archeologist from Harvard University, new city plans may be inspired from the old cities like Maya civilization. Although these city arrangements are too old, new designs has not reached their levels. Thus, the older structures may spark a light for new advancements.
To conclude, in spite of the idea that old buildings protected by rulers should be destroyed, I utterly believe that historical buildings and past must be protected, and also, they can be beneficial as well.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 304, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ates their new generations according to this codes. Furthermore, they can preserve o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 708, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to people who are enthusiastic to visit and learn from these places. In add...
^^
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to visit and learn from these places. In addition, some historical structures ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, may, really, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, for example, in addition, such as, in other words, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44599303136 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17696290117 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602787456446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6159228063 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324107178825 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101965506036 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079751706023 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206098903008 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789804510751 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.