Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
While many museums and historical sites really attract tourists, they seem to be not attractive to local inhabitants. This situation happens due to some reasons, and effective solutions should be proposed to encourage local people to visit these places.
There are several reasons why many local people are not keen on visiting local museums and historical sites. First, because the locals are already familiar with the destinations, they are less likely to visit the places where they have known what they expect to see. Instead, they are more inclined to travel to other tourist attractions where they could obtain an enormous information about the brand new places beyond their areas. Second, because of the high cost of entrance and services that is more suitable for tourists, local people might not be willing to spend their savings on going to these places.
Several actions should be taken to increase the number of local people visiting local destination. The first solution would be for the authorities to hold specific events closely related to these destinations, which motivate more local people to visit and participate in such events. Additionally, the total cost of visiting these places for the locals should be reduced so that it is affordable for the majority of people. This can be done by offering a 50% discount on entrance fee for people living nearby the places. As a result, many local people choose to visit local destinations since they could save their money in comparison to traveling to other tourist places.
In conclusion, few local people visiting museums and historical sites are caused by several factors, and solutions should be produced to attract more local inhabitants going to these places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 584, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...t not be willing to spend their savings on going to these places. Several actions shoul...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, second, so, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1455.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17793594306 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55454547073 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512455516014 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.5409786363 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.553983667616 0.244688304435 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.230841134062 0.084324248473 274% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938026462185 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.379496974917 0.151304729494 251% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032311622984 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.