Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more people to visit these places ?
It is true that people of many part in over the world pay more visited to the museums than historical places or local inhabitants. Although, there are some objective reasons for this, but they should addressed by attracting local people to the museums in some practical solutions.
There are two mainly reasons why museums and historical sites are preferred by tourists than local inhabitants. Firstly, its too familiar with local people. If it is not to change, people feel bored to visited the museums. Secondly, entrance ticket price are expensive with local inhabitants to afford to buy it. For instance,in “Sapa” mountains, Southern in Viet Nam, local people feel too disappointed about service fee. Furthermore, its difficult in their life to earn money and paying the cost of their living. It seem to be that its impossible that paying a part of their salary or a higher amount of money by local inhabitants for entrance tickets.
Authorities in some countries should discuss about some solutions to tackle this outstanding issues efficiently. Firstly, the museums had to invest in quality as well as refresh the exhibits instead of reducing in basic facilities. As a result, almost local people will be interested in this change. Secondly, historical relics need to open public free for local inhabitants. Without worrying about price tickets, people surrounding of the neighborhood will broaden knowledge about their culture and their home town.
In conclusion, although there are many obvious reasons lead to this trends. However, the authorities had to need a efficient policy in some aspects in order to attract more tourists.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that people of many part in o...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... museums in some practical solutions. There are two mainly reasons why museums...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , in
...itants to afford to buy it. For instance,in 'Sapa' mountains, Southern in...
^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...and paying the cost of their living. It seem to be that its impossible that paying a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cal inhabitants for entrance tickets. Authorities in some countries should dis...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut their culture and their home town. In conclusion, although there are many o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... there are many obvious reasons lead to this trends. However, the authorities had to...
^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s. However, the authorities had to need a efficient policy in some aspects in ord...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2803030303 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8400806873 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55303030303 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8472674629 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299590271671 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0968121451238 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870056652716 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179871034795 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824779269065 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.