Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of chrging people for admission to museums outweight the disavantage?
As a matter of fact, charging individuals for admission to museums has been receiving a great deal of social attention due to its substantial impacts on conveying historical purpose. Although this policy is more likely to pose some potential threats for miseums, I am firmly convinced that charging visitors for museums entrances derives more benefits than drawbacks.
To begin with, budget collected from the admission seems to drive museum's administrators from getting trouble in financial problem. To be more specific, maintaince and development are considered to force museums'fund to take account into. Reparing costs, expanding space, renovating and staff costs could consume a considerable amount of money, which result in causing a shortage of budger and even leading museums to shut down. Therefore, admission fee plays a significant shield that prevents museum from financial distress as well as reduces the burden on museum maintainance 'duties.
Secondly, paying amount of money for admission fee is highly beneficiial of inhabitants due to their making full use of time in museums. No one could deny that individuals who enter a place for providing historical or scientific values are tend to spend their time for unecessary and useless actions, which is blamed for demotivating them to pursue their purpose because of its free entry. Therefore, it is clear that entrance fee is seemly very utilitarian to encourage and educate visitors to use facilities offered effectively.
In conclusion, in spite of causing some fear among the public, charching for admission in museums has many pros outweight cons. Hence, I strongly beleive the idea that visitors should pay money for museum entrance, which balance benefits between gallery and inhabitants.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...ing historical or scientific values are tend to spend their time for unecessary and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, as well as, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45421245421 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88166894116 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8570169801 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.363636364 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2727272727 7.06120827912 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324561414773 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116580619262 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770438499758 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1966892147 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528710993303 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.