Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Pibkic health has been receiving a great deal of social attention due to its substantial impacts on human life. It is argued that expanding the sports facilities is the most approriate method of boosting the health of general public, while others believe others measures are better. From my point of view, a comprehensive program is needed to improve citizens' health.
Firstly, It's very vulnerable that sports play a fundamental role not only in contributing a healthy body but also in the treatment of psychological problem. For an example, running thirty minutes per day is more likely to burning up individual's stress and cholesterol of all day. No one could deny that with greater availability of recreation facilities in each community has an essential impact on convenience for citizens to exercise, in terms of saving money and time of most career pesons. The aspect of well-being promotion is critical value of sports devices in attemt to uphold the public health.
By contrast, a pubilc awareness able to have one's fitness, would effect either people's well-being or their understanding of this issue. This means that almost people ignore the importance of exercising regularly, which seems to worse some of the negative result on their body. For them, such factors like self-regulation, healthy lifestyle, balanced diets are more attractive than public facilities.
In my point of view, to improve the helath of public, goverment should shoulder their duties to construct more sports facilities, better healthcare services as well as take action to raise public awareness of doing sports.
To conclude, the strategy of buildings and equipments for sports at community has advantages outweight disadvantages. However, this only be achieved some benefits by a long -term health education and specific nationwide publicity campaigns.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...oriate method of boosting the health of general public, while others believe others measures a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...es per day is more likely to burning up individuals stress and cholesterol of all day. No o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ntrast, a pubilc awareness able to have ones fitness, would effect either peoples we...
^^^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...reness able to have ones fitness, would effect either peoples well-being or their unde...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...rcising regularly, which seems to worse some of the negative result on their body. For them...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38062283737 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94235270598 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660899653979 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9005711767 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.615384615 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.15384615385 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262387075266 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848911834441 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626641167951 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140350930375 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451849461493 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.