Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is clear that educational program has been receiving a great deal in social attention due to its substantial impacts on human's life. Some people argue that the allowance for university students to choose optional subjects is neccessary while others believe that students should only be able to study subjects that will be vulnerable in the future such as science and technology. From my point of view, I firmly convince that optional subjects seem to be better for students.
No one could deny that a range of subjects, in terms of relating to science and technology, is more likely to contribute visibly to society. In any historical time period, these kinds of subjects play an significant role not ony in an attempt to forward human's life but also in forming human's civilization foundation. For an example, improvements in medicine rely on advances in medical research, engineering, computer science and technology. Allowing students to learn their subjects is more likely to pose some potential ability of each person, who has a chance to discover their own value in such fields. Moreover, this acts as an measurement for government to ease some pressure about the shortage of workforce in science and technology sector since there will be more people available for work in their areas.
While the benefits of more graduates in these kinds of useful subjects is clear, I strongly believe that it would be a mistake to allow students to study these subjects. This has a negative impact on students, which is blamed for inspiring some boring and withdrawals of universities due to their unsuitability. The idea of mandatory subjects even seem to worse individuals'future since society is not able to accurately predict the future and what kinds of skills that people will need for job, which means that students who are only trained to be good scientists or engineers are less likely to suceed in new fields. People deserve a right to choose whatever subjects they desire to pursue their dream.
To conclude, while it may seem reasonable to force students to study subjects that are currently viewed as useful, I believe that the allowance to choose optional subjects will help society be better prepared for whatever changes the future will bring
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ntion due to its substantial impacts on humans life. Some people argue that the allowa...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...me period, these kinds of subjects play an significant role not ony in an attempt ...
^^
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...t role not ony in an attempt to forward humans life but also in forming humans civiliz...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... in such fields. Moreover, this acts as an measurement for government to ease some...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04557640751 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76354844514 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522788203753 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8061485614 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.769230769 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6923076923 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387160004306 0.244688304435 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131199472348 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117883200736 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247657280523 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678453518904 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.