Many museums charge for admission while others are free.
Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?
Museums are the epicenter to preserve and showcase our cultural identity, traditions, and history. Some museums are unrestricted to the general public, whereas some require a fee to enter. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the idea of charging for admissions and in this essay, I will support my view with examples.
There are several reasons why I agree with charging people for museums outweigh the disadvantages. To begin with, the main advantage of charging admissions creates funding for the museum. Surviving on government funds without charging people, would make it hard to maintain and create new and exciting exhibits. Moreover, museums are not the main priority for governments, most of their tax revenue proceeds to improve the healthcare or the education sectors, and due to this, there would only be a small budget to improve its facilities. Additionally, charging fees improve the quality of the museum, and as a result, this attracts potential visitors and tourists. A positive trend can be seen in the tourism industry in the country.
However, on the other hand, some people assert that museums should be free for all. They feel that it promotes every class of people in the country to learn more about their background. It helps poor people, passionate about arts to visit. By contrast, it wouldn’t be able to restrict certain people (for example beggars) from entering.
In conclusion, from the above-mentioned reasons, I believe that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. Charging for admission not only help create a state-of-the-art museum but also generates tourism and educate people about their culture.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...y. Some museums are unrestricted to the general public, whereas some require a fee to enter. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill support my view with examples. There are several reasons why I agree wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e tourism industry in the country. However, on the other hand, some people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for example beggars from entering. In conclusion, from the above-mentioned ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32061068702 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91441144452 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3339710092 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9333333333 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39914091074 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129986772759 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115091140631 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236973309464 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060870102889 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.