In many parts of the world, women study science and technology but do not work in these fields. What measures can be taken to encourage women to work in science and technology?
A challenge of working in the field of one’s education is real for women all over the world, and this issue is particularly evident in the science and technology industry. This essay will first suggest that this is a male dominated sector with a very intense working schedule, and then argue that promoting females for leadership roles and allowing for more flexible office routine are the most viable solutions.
The foremost problems women face are an employee gender profile in scientific and technological companies, further complicated by long office hours. Being historically dominated by men, such firms have developed a gender bias, resulting in a very low number of offers made to female graduates looking for internships. Moreover, current employees have adopted a high performing style of work, completely ignoring needs of those with family commitments. A prime example lies with the companies specialised in medical technology in the UK, 90% of which do not offer working from home option at all.
Possible solutions to these problems would be prioritising female-led promotions, alongside providing people with an opportunity of remote working. By nominating ladies for a head of department roles, organisations will lower an entrance barrier for the same gender adults. Furthermore, intellectually intensive professions normally require only an internet connection to operate, hence letting individuals work from a different location should be relatively easy to implement, giving a great deal of flexibility to mothers and wives, trying to balance out professional and personal responsibilities. For instance, in Spain, enterprises that offer three months of working from any geographical location per year, report a 90% retention of female staff.
To conclude, since the majority of roles in science or technology related departments are occupied by the opposite sex, which dictates the mantra of overworking, female adults are facing difficulties in employing their academical skills. Therefore, to address these issues, more women managers should be hired and flexibility in working arrangements should become a new normal.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08274218972 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652307692308 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.3882972972 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.75 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0833333333 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231321856064 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833434917136 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075229558633 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142706208214 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457424864024 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.