Nowadays, many individuals think twice before stepping outside their homes due to an increasing crime rate in many nations. It is often argued that more stringent laws can be introduced for the protection of the citizens. On the other hand, some people believe that there is little opportunity to permanently eradicate violent offenses. Both the contrasting views are discussed in this essay, and I believe that stricter regulations can certainly eliminate illegal activities and ensure the safety of the people.
For the prevention of crime in any nation, government authority can make harsh laws for criminal offenses, so as to develop a sense of fear in the minds of miscreants. Such strict punishments can set an example for those people who indulge in brutal offenses. Furthermore, the government can upgrade the security arrangements with the latest technology for surveillance, like digitally face recognition methods to identify the suspects from the crowd. Such initiatives are proven to be successful in some developing countries, Dubai, for example, where with stringent laws and upgraded technology, the government is able to prevent offending in the first place.
On the contrary, some individuals opine that there is a slight opportunity to control the unlawful activities in society, as it a conundrum task to change the mentality of criminals. They think that despite harsh laws and vocational training to avert crime, there will always a proportion of citizens who have no fear of repercussions of their wrongdoings, and they cannot be changed into civilized human beings. In countries like China, for example, despite hard punishments for criminals, the crime rate in the country is second highest across the globe. Therefore stringent policies are failed to mitigate unlawfulness in such nations.
To conclude, on one hand, some individuals think that with a harsh approach towards bad elements of the society, the crime rate can be controlled to a larger extent. On the other hand, some people believe that strict laws cannot always work to eradicate the motives of convicts. I think that there should be a collaborative effort by all the nations to work in the same direction for the prevention of serious incidents, and this can be achieved by sharing intelligence and ensuring public safety through reformatory schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... make harsh laws for criminal offenses, so as to develop a sense of fear in the minds of...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...try is second highest across the globe. Therefore strict laws are failed to stop crime in...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, i think, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22554347826 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91235264156 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6031744973 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.2 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283386480081 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992441119536 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497239541951 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190907742011 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723268923807 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.