Many people believe that the current system of both teacher and students in the classroom will no longer exist by the year 2050. to what extent do you agree with this opinion?
It is believed that the traditional system of education which both teaches and students are in the classroom which will no longer be applied in 2050. Although this opinion may be based on the predicted strong development of modern technology in the future, I disagree with this because I believe that the traditional system still has important roles which could not be replaced by the technology.
There are some reasons why people believe that the new method of education in which both teachers and students are not in classroom may be applied in the future. The development of internet allows the distance online learning which offer flexible options for learners. In addition, learning through internet may reduce the expense of building school or universities. Therefore, the government would have a large fund to invest in other matters.
However, the traditional system still plays an irreplaceable role in education. Firstly, face to face learning will be easier for teachers to explain and impart the knowledge as well as inspire their student to study. Secondly, the students will have a great physical environment to build good relationships with their teachers and friends. The skills such as communication, team work are also improved through directly interacting with their classmates.
In conclusion, I contend that the new method of teaching will support and provide the students with lots of advantages and may be increasingly important to education. Nevertheless, the traditional system will not be completely replaced in the future due to its great value.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.316 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9222155978 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8394512554 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9166666667 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241998328239 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848121444519 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823320399152 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144301952991 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643281224619 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.