Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Reducing global environmental damage should be handled by governments rather than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people contend that government, not individuals should solve the environmental issues. I totally disagree with that view because global environmental problems must be tackled by both government and individuals.
On the one hand, the government plays an important role in protecting the environment. Many sollutions should be implemented to prevent the depletation of natural resources by government. For example, lots of researches have been done to find the renewable resources such as wind power, solar power to replace the limited natural resources like fossil fuels. These guarantee the unlimited resources for future using. Moreover, government promotes variety of programs to raise the awareness of people in environmental problems and how to conserve the natural life. In order to prevent the damaging impacts on human activities on ecosystems, the government also issues many regulars which require that factories have to process the industrial wastes before discharging into the rivers or oceans.

On the other hand, each individuals should give a hand to protect the Earth. Using the energy smartly and properly is the best way to save the natural resources. Turning off the lights or taps after using is a small but effective action which contributes to conserve the resources. Another ways are planting trees or commuting by public transpotations in order to reduce the greenhouse gas and solve the air pollution issue.

In conclusion, the environment degradation is the heated issues which has damaging impacts on human and natural life. Therefore, both Government and people have the responsibilities to protect the environment.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (8 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54150197628 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03812989328 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592885375494 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9513844779 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.142857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186028426482 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628120173524 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558296798691 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122614930602 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732002341235 0.056905535591 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.