Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their countries. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism?
Many individuals opine that foreign tourism brings negative effects to their countries. It is hard for tourists to acclimatize themselves with the culture of destination; however, be reversed, with strategic steps by a government.
There are several reasons for the resistance of the resident. Firstly, the way of the attitude of international tourists is often harmful to culture and tradition customs, since many tourists are careless and insensitive about their emotions and behaviours. For instance, "Isfahan" full of the holy historical place, inappropriate clothes and Failure to follow provisions will cause discomfort and anger among locals. Secondly, foreign tourists are often criticized for their contribution to environmental degradation. The waste disposal such as water cans, paper and so on by tourists, are the main factors leading to water, air & soil contamination.
Nonetheless, the negative impact of global tourists can be reduced by the government's awareness campaigns to explain the benefits of international tourism, as it contributes to the development of local people. today ecotourism is one of the essential financial sources for each country, this would not only create job opportunities but also boost the local economy. some countries in the world have any natural source to make money but they use of tourist facility to achieve this goal. A good illustration of this is Brazil. Additionally, the government must be provided information about the traditions and culture to foreign visitors through different media, such as roadside billboards and advertisements.
in conclusion, although international visitor had a bad effect on the traditions and customs of each county, the authority can provide the infrastructure which changes this negative attitude by highlighting the advantages of foreign visitors to their countrymen and get acquainted tourists to the native way of living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...torical place, inappropriate clothes and Failure to follow provisions will cause ...
^^
Line 9, column 75, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...f global tourists can be reduced by the governments awareness campaigns to explain the bene...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Today
...es to the development of local people. today ecotourism is one of the essential fina...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 368, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ities but also boost the local economy. some countries in the world have any natural...
^^^^
Line 9, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...his goal. A good illustration of this is Brazil. Additionally, the government mus...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ide billboards and advertisements. in conclusion, although international visi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73263888889 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30968089397 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621527777778 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6839016836 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288255807011 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0929009780714 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581828509471 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165343845227 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169828392124 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.