It is generally believed that some people are born with certain talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not. However, it is sometimes claimed that any child can be taught to become a good sports person or musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
People have different views of successful athletes and musicians. Some claim that their talent is of genetic origin. However, others believe that good training can make an expert person in any field. In my opinion, nature and nurture, both play an equal role for a child to become a successful professional.
Some people argue that if children born with an inherent talent, they do not need to work hard to exhibit their skills. The main reason supported this attitude is, many of the famous musicians and sportsmen have shown remarkable progress and achievements from an early age. One good illustration of this is Mozart, being effortlessly capable of composing music since his early childhood. It is true, If talent had nothing to do with achievement, then rich students with better facilities always have performed better than the poor. We have many da Vinci and Shakespeare in every country.
On the other side, the talent is not adequate without practice and hard work. Many children are born with genius, but they could not flourish without learning. Every innate talent is required encouragement and teaching. Thus, an excellent teaching method can bring out the best of children and guide them for the rest of their life. For example, Arta is a Persian child who has extraordinary ability in the sport. Concluded, that any child can develop outstanding skills in sports provided that they are trained well. In other words, perseverance is the key to success.
In conclusion, through consistent practice, anyone can do expertise in arts and sports. This, however, does not mean that inborn skills are irrelevant. They do matter, but those born with special talents also need the practice to gain skill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 589, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Vinci and Shakespeare in every country. On the other side, the talent is not ade...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1453.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1524822695 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63170265422 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624113475177 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1563746516 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.4736842105 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8421052632 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261330939937 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692910864132 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550067576042 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150251320103 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789110917774 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.