Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
Tourists bring many opportunities to develop the country's economy; however, some argue that international tourists have an impact on a country. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to tackle the issue.
On the one hand, it is inevitable that a quite large number of tourists will definitely make the environment of this country worse as crowding leads to traffic congestion and also destroys habitat, consumes natural resources, and is unaware when non-biodegradable materials are thrown into the environment, such as beaches and coral reefs. Equally important is to increase the rate of disease transmission from foreign countries, which often results in killing many people who are infected with these viruses. For example, in 2019, COVID-19 was expanded to every continent of the globe, killing more than 15 million individuals all over the world and still go on with no sign of disappearing at the present time.
On the other hand, there are a number of viable solutions to tackling this problem. Firstly, this is not only a native problem but also a serious international problem, so the government needs to encourage and publicise the policy to increase awareness on social media by putting up banners about the importance of the environment on the road where people can easily see them in traffic. Moreover, building medical stations at border gates and airports to control epidemics with modern equipment will protect the nation from new pathogens.
In conclusion, changing negative attitudes towards international tourism requires a comprehensive approach that addresses the concerns of local communities while promoting sustainable and responsible practices. Collaboration between governments, tourism organisations, locals, and tourists is crucial to achieve a more balanced and mutually beneficial tourism industry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...nment, such as beaches and coral reefs. Equally important is to increase the rate of di...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52413793103 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05268054368 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662068965517 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.0628687337 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.2 106.682146367 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181865922805 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629460495384 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046393119605 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104941793608 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519435477286 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.0946893788 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.33 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.