Many people believe that teachers should take the responsibility for the students to judge what is
right and wrong and behave well; others feel that teachers should only teach academic subjects.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Although school is considered as space for obtaining knowledge, teacher has always been attached to extra significance beyond a job of knowledge delivery. There’s long lasting debate against teachers should provide guidance for both academic and moral education or only focus on subjects learning is enough. For my perspective, it is just an essential requirement to keep excellent quality of academic education, teachers should participate in moral education as well.
On one hand, nobody can deny that teachers should take academic performance as the top priority. After all, the first function of school education is to impart knowledge and grantee the quality of teaching. To meet the expectation from parents and society that their kids could grow up as a citizen with decent life, tutors should be well-prepared and put numerous of efforts to keep their concentration and expertise on specialized fields.
On the other hand, although parents should be the first to take responsibility for their kid’s behaviour, students, especially in early age, spend most of their time at school, during which they not only acquired knowledge, but also formed their characteristic, self-identification, and sense of value gradually. There’s a saying in China “Guide by your word, teach by your action.” Therefore, teachers also play an irreplaceable role on shaping student’s principles. Students should be led to learn including universal moral ideas, how to get along with other individuals, fundamental discipline of teamwork but not limited. In the meanwhile, tutors must draw a clear distinction between moral education and private opinion. As an educator, it’s unprofessional to take the job as a weapon that spreading personal value judgemental views.
In conclusion, teachers should never be isolated from student’s moral education, but there remains a boundary cannot be crossed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 500, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to include'.
Suggestion: to include
...ciples. Students should be led to learn including universal moral ideas, how to get along...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, after all, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58131487889 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14770124566 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61937716263 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4724492704 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28136348937 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989455364004 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663985927863 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165218964433 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512601011063 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.