Some people think that governments should only focus their spending on public services, and they
claims that spending on arts is a waste of money. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There has been a never-ending debate on how the government should allocate public purse. Nobody will resist the argument that public funds must be contributed to improve public services, while some taxpayers regard the expense of other areas, like art, as a waste. From my perspective, the proportion of the public budget should be decided by the current economic trends.
Undoubtedly, investment against culture industry could drain resources from other fields related to residents' well-being, especially under a depressed economic situation. The general public tend to spend most of the social resources on fields that can meet the essential demand of personal livelihood, to exemplify, education and medical care. In the meanwhile, the features of cultural investment determined the benefit can only be witnessed in a long term, which made it look like a parasite of public finance by taxpayers. Therefore, it is reasonable for the public to attribute financial hardship to cultural investment.
However, there could be quite another scene during the boom period. Along with the positive expectation of economic trends, people's demand for aesthetics and culture industries would steeply increase under the circumstance that mundane life has no longer been a burden. Consumers not only have the ability, but also the motivation to afford extra cost on spiritual enjoyment. Cultural investment from the authorities could be well accepted by the majority of people. Furthermore, activities supported by government finance could send out an optimistic hint to related business market, creating numerous demands on relevant industries, such as exhibition and tourism, which can promote social employment, and feed back to public finance further.
In conclusion, cultural investment can either be the source of public dissatisfaction through the hard times or the icing on the cake during the period of wealth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...er a depressed economic situation. The general public tend to spend most of the social resour...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55136986301 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89947573897 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8961474762 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.692307692 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115439490491 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411427291464 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334556325615 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693201898912 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427818445365 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.