A significant proportion of people choose their area of work at an early stage of life. They believe that by preparing well in advance, their career could be made much more promising with enormous satisfaction. Though majority consider it to be a positive approach but rest might have different perception about satisfaction.
Around the globe it could be witnessed that, for challenging work profiles such as to be a doctor, children start preparing before time. This enable them to grab the seat among reputed institutions which are less in number. All this is not easy to achieve, for an instance there are less than 1500 seats available in India among medical colleges and from lacks of aspirant those who had struggled hard could meet their goal. Moreover, with wise planning they become what they want and earn enormous perks, with huge respect from society, which leads to great sense of satisfaction.
On the opposite angle, some people accord that satisfaction is independent of prior planning for a particular work domain.They believe that healthy environment or may be an inspirational boss would eclipse the challenges of working in an irrelevant profile, inturn making work more enthusiastic. Other than this, for few people satisfaction may vary with time. As an example, Mahatma Gandhi had sacrificed a lot to achieve his childhood dream of becoming a lawyer. His sound knowledge and early age preparation made him eminent personality of his domain with huge rewards, but he left all this as his satisfaction migrated from lawyer towards fighting for independence of the nation.
To recapitulate, it can be implicated that though for good proportion of people prior preparation leads them to achieve highly satisfying work profile but for others it may depend on the situation or directly proportionate with time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
...at among reputed institutions which are less in number. All this is not easy to achieve, for a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...r planning for a particular work domain.They believe that healthy environment or may...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20945945946 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87319511739 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611486486486 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.7025766784 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239283508231 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872467580652 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610016815409 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147471239769 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226014621673 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.