Many people disagree with the school about forcing children to learn new languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Many people disagree with the school about forcing children to learn new languages. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that it is not necessary to urge children to learn new languages at school. This essay disagrees that languages play an unimportant role in children’s lives. Firstly, this essay will discuss the disapproval among parents in learning new languages and secondly, it will discuss the advantages of tendency.

On the one hand, it is true that the majority of parents today do not let their children spend a great deal of time focusing on learning new languages, and offer the opinion to the education system that children should not be forced to learn as well. The prime reason of this is due to parental perspectives, in which it is more preferable for their children to concentrate on academic subjects such as maths, physics or science, rather than trying to speak a language, which is totally unfamiliar with their cultures. For example, Vietnamese parents tend to drop English subject in their children’s daily timetable in an attempt to gain more time and access to other subjects. Consequently, children would become more academically successful in their study.

On the other hand, I believe that encouraging young schoolers to develop the ability to speak different languages is extremely essential in the education system. This is a contributing factor to help children have a keen understanding of various cultures belonging to different countries. For example, by being competent at speaking English, children could be more aware of using words more appropriately in different cultural contexts rather than speaking their own voices by translating directly from their mother tongue. Despite this, being a polyglot would greatly benefit children not only in their daily lives but also in academic work.

In conclusion, although many believe that learning new languages is unimportant, and the reason is a waste of time, I argue that we should not ignore this due to its benefits.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91331116365 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548701298701 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.0356794561 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5833333333 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181711105259 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718031610635 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066881671009 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110028250043 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561928955979 0.056905535591 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.