Many people think that museums will be replaced by technology as most information can be found free online. Others believe that museums are still important.
Will museums no longer be needed in the future?
Is this a positive development?
Humanity has been trying to save the legacy of ancestors throughout the history. There is an assumption that museums are an essential source of data of human development. Other people suppose that in the near future technology will supersede them due the fact it is considered fast and convenient to search information in the Internet. This essay will discuss the necessity of museums and consequences of introducing digital developments in this field.
Firstly, museums implement the role of depository keeping the artifacts and documents about events that took place several centuries ago. Therefore, the authorities organize and sponsor archeological expeditions for exploring ancient materials in order to analyze and make them open to public scrutiny. It means that in this historical institution people can easily scrutinize the process of human evolution. For instance, according to survey results of the Russian academy of sciences practically 90 % of visitors trust the information presented in museums. Thus, museums ought to exist since this institution enable humanity to explore and save their heritage and also transfers it to offsprings.
However, technologies will replace museums in the future because even now current generation are applying the internet to seek historical information, but this aspect will possess negative effects. Thereby, every year the amount of misinformation is rapidly increasing, thus people cannot be confident in credibility of history. This is because data provided by the Internet can be hacked and deliberately rewritten and users are unable to verify them without visiting a museum. In other words, replacement museums by digital resources will have negatory results for knowledge of history.
In conclusion, this essay shed light on the importance of museums and put forward some negative consequences of replacing them by technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uences of replacing them by technology.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65263157895 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01017273741 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.525750254 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345784389151 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104733015636 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699746260572 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19794086571 0.151304729494 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875176279947 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.