Many people think watching TV is fully bad for children Others think that TV is beneficial for their development of them Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Many people think watching TV is fully bad for children. Others think that TV is beneficial for their development of them. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It is argued that watching TV has a negative impact on children, while other people believe that the positive development of children has mainly come from watching TV. This essay discusses both sides of this argument, and then I will give my own perspective.

On one side of the argument, there are people who argue that the disadvantages of watching TV considerably outweigh its benefits. The main reason for believing this is that spending much time with their eyes glued to the television screen has harmful effects on children’s health. To illustrate, many kids nowadays suffer from various health problems including eyes strain, obesity, and exhaustion due to excessive watching of TV and a severe lack of outdoor activities or exercise. Another reason is that many television programs or movies currently contain some violent connotations or even sexual imagines, which are considered inappropriate for young children’s viewing and more likely to put children at a higher risk of violent behavior causing to ruin their future.

However, there are also advantages of children’s development from watching a lot of TVs. Firstly, young children would easily widen their knowledge and horizons by watching educational TV programs. For example, there are many different kinds of TV programs such as Math Lesson or BBC Learning that deliver information to children outside the school. As well as, watching TV is a useful way to stimulate young children’s creativity in life. Art channels and shows involving music composing or drawing promote the mind and encourage children to answer their inner calling.

In conclusion, I believe that both sides of the argument have their merits. On balance, however, it seems that watching TV brings more benefits for young children’s development. This is because if the children spend time watching TV, they will be more likely to enrich their knowledge and develop their creative skills.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ruining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: ruining
...higher risk of violent behavior causing to ruin their future. However, there are al...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...nal TV programs. For example, there are many different kinds of TV programs such as Math Lesso...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...edge and develop their creative skills.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34201954397 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84337395277 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589576547231 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1212761182 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364356775906 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133326351582 0.084324248473 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593822537269 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241975379337 0.151304729494 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227556737143 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.