Many psychologists believe that social media is the main reason for stress of people in the modern life. Do you agree?
Social networks play a vital role in human life. Majority of psychologist claimed that social networks is the main factors being cause of appearance stress. I totally agree with this notion and think that social networks encourage someone to do more activities in online that offline.
First of all, make mental health became interfered. In other words, majority of social networks usage is juveniles, from this activity made forgot all of jobs must be done. Moreover, addicted by social networks is the best reason why people less interaction by visual and tend to quiet and become introvert person. For instance, survey conducted in National Institute of Mental Health declared that using social networks have capable to increasing risk of disruption in teenagers. Thats why the impact of social networks will give effect to social life on society members foremost juveniles.
Secondly, habit to use gadget created emotional of someone can not control. Spend a lot of time on gadget screen will make people to disagreeable without reason clearly. On the other hand, they prefer to invent some socialization by online than interface as a result communication among people was disappeared. For example, a psychologist said that relationship that appear in social networks can not to made indulgence from emotional side, ultimately level of depression more highest than usual. Thus, frequency of someone use electronic tools will make emotional of someone changes relatively.
To conclude, sophistication of internet as evidence that majority of human more obsessed than doing activities in real life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 481, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...easing risk of disruption in teenagers. Thats why the impact of social networks will ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'highest' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: highest
...al side, ultimately level of depression more highest than usual. Thus, frequency of someone ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39043824701 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78318720423 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7489018627 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6428571429 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222112444776 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749472479049 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511773229421 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132428078756 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529642121191 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.