Many students have to study subjects they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people believe that some students need to attend the courses that they do not even like them, while others dismiss them as a waste of time. Although there are a number of drawbacks involved in this trend, the benefits accruing to the students who participate in these classes are by no means negligible. Admittedly, I believe that students gain more knowledge by participating in these classes.
On the one hand, supporters of the idea that students do not need to participate in the classes are the advocate that these classes are wasteful by nature. To begin with, the more students attend the classes they do not like, the more they hate the school and the sciences as a whole. Hating the subjects, the students are likely to get a low mark in it due to the fact that they do not like to study that subject. Thus, this will lead to having a sense of discouraged and hate; not only from the school, itself but also from the whole science and studying as well.
On the other hand, some individuals believe that learning the subjects that some students do not like have a far-reaching positive impact on their future lives. The most compelling reason justifying their assertion is that were students not to attend any course they did not like, they would face with a lot of problems in the course of living. That is to say, they are bound to learn that they have to fight and deal with most of the things they do not like, and this would be a good example of that. Therefore, this kind of courses will lay the groundwork for them to be prepared to deal with most of the problems or even people who they hate. Moreover, some students may say that sometimes little by little, not only are they live that course, but also they want to attend to more advanced classes.
To sum up, attending to the courses in which students hate, can be both rewarding and problematic; however, I believe that the disadvantages are likely to take their toll on those who do not sign up for the courses in which they are not like.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, kind of, of course, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 7.30460921844 287% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51226158038 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37929117868 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455040871935 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.21349266 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.384615385 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349369527226 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141072092144 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693249296978 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218031079256 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070586727399 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 11.3001002004 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.