Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
It is mentioned that having bought food, people wasted it without paying attention. There are compelling reasons why citizens throw away a large amount of edible products and many things can be done to remedy this problem.
There are several reasons why food has been wasted. To begin with, people do not pay attention to the value of food. That is to say, most of people have no clue about the tedious process of cultivating crops to make them edible materials. Take a person who has no knowledge about the process of making cereals as an example; he might throw away a considerable amount of that product every day regardless of its value. Also, some people would like to experience different sort of foods. As a result they purchase more than they need and have to leave the food wasted. Many families, for example, order extra food at restaurant in order to taste novel cuisine.
Given the facts, to amend these problems many approaches can be taken in to account. At first, people need to be educated about the difficulties of making food and its ingredient. Were it not for the hard work of farmers and workers, we could have suffer famine these days. Farmers have taken care of our needs for crops and people should acknowledge their effort by cautiously usage of their products. Furthermore, surplus food can be donated to charities to share usable foods with others. In this way, no food will be thrown away and people with the eager of tasting new foods can give the extra food away.
In conclusion, many reasons come to mind when we consider food waste; however, addressing this issue can be happened with ease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...n to the value of food. That is to say, most of people have no clue about the tedious process ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'suffered'.
Suggestion: suffered
...k of farmers and workers, we could have suffer famine these days. Farmers have taken c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, sort of, as a result, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73591549296 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3729364123 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4354497343 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0625 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387904740712 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131370388052 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913570513314 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239043160872 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827420082442 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.