Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants. Why do you think people waste food? What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away?
Wastage of food has increased manifold recently. There is a general problem of people filling their plate with more than what they can eat and conveniently throwing the leftover to bin. This essay will elaborate upon the reasons behind the increased wastage of eatables and steps that can be taken to reduce this problem.
To begin with, with economic prosperity people these days have much wider options to choose from. When offered with so many options, people often fill more then what they can eat. Most of these folks without knowing the rigorous process that takes places to bring food from farms to the dining table, easily throw away the leftover items to bin. The best example of this, the world superpower, America, which wastes more food than any other country in the world. While, in many poor countries, people often find it difficult to arrange basic meal. This difference between the haves and have nots is conveniently forgotten when piles of food is wasted each time.
The glaring problem of food wastage needs involvement of communities and individuals. Communities should run campaigns to raise awareness among people about importance of food. In these awareness programs, schools and offices can become the platform to run such campaigns. Moreover, it has been observed that most of the food is wasted after parties, hence, organizers should tie up with the NGOs to distribute the leftover food to needy people. In addition to these, governments can regulate the wastage by charging higher taxes or penalties on households with the kitchen wastage more than a threshold.
To conclude, increasing wastage of food is a serious problem that needs to be tackled at an individual, community and governmental level. People should be made to realize that while they conveniently throw the food, there is someone who goes to bed empty stomach.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...of people filling their plate with more then what they can eat and conveniently thro...
^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...so many options, people often fill more then what they can eat. Most of these folks ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, so, then, while, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09803921569 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52629386799 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6206893704 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3125 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321917606262 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104970184913 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484356330545 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201735486838 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025877965765 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.