Many students have to study subjects which they do not like. Some people think this is a complete waste of time.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Considering the obligation of study subjects which are implied as unfavorable matters and contributed as a complete waste of time, I strongly incline to support the necessity of all required subjects for students despite their negative affection. It is worth nothing, the students interest in not only subject to choose the required subjects. As far as I concerned, there are lots of criteria that should be precisely consider to select the appropriate subjects for students. To elaborate more on the issue mentioned, the following reasons and examples will be presented.
First and foremost, the critical role of advisers to stimulate students' interest and form the student tendency to study subjects that may resist to learn cannot be neglected. In other words, when students select a major, they should be advised thoroughly about the required subjects and introduced briefly about the background, the viewpoint and finally the importance of the subjects. Thus, the initial negative response of students to some subjects can be reflected as a deficiency in perfect advising. Needless to say, this gap can be modified by reinforcement of advisory meetings for students who are not interest in some subjects. Therefore, if some students do not like required subjects, the elimination of subjects cannot be defined as a definite solution.
Being one of the most proliferated known topic in psychological investigation of educational programs, the positive and negative responses of many students are identified as a natural characteristic. To my best knowledge, the first factor to choose the educational subjects is the importance of selected subjects for the future profession of the students in conjunction with necessity of their disciplines. Thus, the priority of students' professional requirements is higher than their interests. Neither the students' tendency for their subjects nor the deficiency of required clarifications for understanding the importance of the subjects, should not be implied as a decisive criterion to include or exclude a subject. It is crystal clear that the first assessment and affection of a student to the selected subjects is based on the psychological characteristics and they may not be aware from the importance of the subjects in their future vocations. Thus, instead of subject elimination based on the student interest, it is more advisable to notice students about the importance of the subject in their future profession. In addition, some modifications in the subject sections to reveal the appropriate consistency with students’ future vocations may be helpful.
Taking all these perspectives into account, I cannot disagree more about the elimination of some subjects based on the students' tendency regarding the necessity of advising before studying a subject and the importance of the subject in future professions. Although, the students interest can be implied as a crucial factor to accelerate their understanding domains, it cannot be considered as a critical factor to eliminate the required subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 419, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider selecting'.
Suggestion: consider selecting
...ts of criteria that should be precisely consider to select the appropriate subjects for students. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'resist learning'.
Suggestion: resist learning
...ent tendency to study subjects that may resist to learn cannot be neglected. In other words, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 509, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...igher than their interests. Neither the students tendency for their subjects nor the def...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...' future vocations may be helpful. Taking all these perspectives into accou...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...imination of some subjects based on the students tendency regarding the necessity of adv...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, finally, first, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2598.0 1615.20841683 161% => OK
No of words: 471.0 315.596192385 149% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51592356688 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19823033816 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430997876858 0.561755894193 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 823.5 506.74238477 163% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.5814183486 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203645963448 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790997062435 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461656805449 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137612300487 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268755105686 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.