Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages?
Currently, machines to be popular for human today, it can be done many things in the home by hands that used to be done. Definitely, I agree to cast a vote for it seeing that many profitable from modern technology.
On the one hand, progressive technology greatly beneficial for people's daily lives as well as saving energy and times. Moreover, outwork expeditious finished and do not required to pull out a lot of money to settle for labor. Indeed, populace will be gain maximal output and they might taking the occasion for vacation with relatives. Accordingly, these sophisticated motor that exist in the present build human cultivate serve straightforward and uncomplicated.
On the other hand, these tools shall render humane pampered suppose that inert to do modest object at home and considerable moments are misspent on outside activity to scooped up of finances. Whereas, chore rushing compose the body wholesome by reason of feasible rehearsal at home every day and inflict the ozone depletion. For example, clothes dryer, air conditioner, refrigerator and other. Most of these equipment draw upon more electricity, so there ambition to waste and dredging the maximum natural resources, this is not favorable for the earth and the upcoming generation. Addicted to contemporary technology desire to make convention and reduce society intimate then not worthy for the outgrowth of childhood.
In the inference of era advancement, community in the world easily to pick up the benefits and exploit it. The prodigious originator of ideas, author, developer, engineer and creator from various parts of the realm to competing to invent and detect anything that can be made. humans creating robots to help colonys work, which are still manual and traditional. Surely, there losses and utility. However, they contrived it to common interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this equipment' or 'these equipments'?
Suggestion: this equipment; these equipments
...tioner, refrigerator and other. Most of these equipment draw upon more electricity, so there am...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Humans
...t and detect anything that can be made. humans creating robots to help colonys work, w...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, moreover, so, still, then, well, whereas, for example, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30612244898 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86092234633 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.683673469388 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3402238111 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196056809377 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488487411751 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113338959705 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12850024266 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143747607779 0.056905535591 253% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.