The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014.
The map highlights the redevelopment of the region with waterfront in Darwin town during the 2009-2014 period
In general, the waterfront area of Darwin town has become a much greener place with a large number of trees and accommodations.
As illustrated from the map, the most striking difference between two given years was that all industrial sites in this waterfront region has been removed. As for the one near the lake, a tiny swimming pool was built in its location. This increase the total number of the swimming pool to 3. Otherwise, other factors inside the circular footpath remained untouched
One the other hand, the other industrial area, which occupied a large amount of land, has also now been demolished to make room for several different facilities., the number of residential buildings was double in number and there was also a university sprang up nearly. The remaining of the land was covered with trees and a footpath cut through led to the seashore, in which there was a construction of the huge harbour
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...wn has become a much greener place with a large number of trees and accommodations. As illustr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...so now been demolished to make room for several different facilities., the number of residential ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: double
...the number of residential buildings was double in number and there was also a university sprang ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e was a construction of the huge harbour
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 1615.20841683 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 173.0 315.596192385 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02312138728 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77776790254 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 176.041082164 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578034682081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 506.74238477 51% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.9501006749 49.4020404114 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156136641376 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716651534821 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114796929626 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138463943367 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107303918003 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.