Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. Some people argue that money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree ?
In this day and age, an increasing number of people are concerned about the fact that whether a wave of money should be allocated in researching the universe or othe fields that enhance people's living standards. I completely agree with the idea that the union funding should be diverted toward making living standards for peole better.
First, it goes without saying that it is vital to put money on other aspects, especially education and healthcare. In other words, it is a common norm to state that people are settling in a knowledge-based society where degrees are cherished, which means education is one of the immense determinants to one nation's flourishing. For instance, investing a budget in this category, by reducing tuition fees and providing scholarships for chidren, may efficiently produce qualified workforces for a country. In addition, medical care systems should also be emphasized. This means that owing to the fact that health is one of the measurements deciding a nation's prosperity, splurging money on buying top-notch machinery for medical purposes may bring a wealth of benefits to people's health conditions.
That is not to say that space travelling does not act as a precursor to people's lives. Obviously, the investment in cutting-edge spacecraft along with exploring the galaxy may play a paramount significant role in preventing fatal situations. Take the breakthrough in satellite design as a prime example, it can be cited as a viiable instance, which may precisely anticipate extreme natural disasters namely the tsunami or earthquake. Nevertheless, not all countries can have space exploration programs since the money spent on these programs is considerably large, which only countries with huge economies, such as America or Russia, can afford to fund such programs.
In conclusion, I would argue that some practical fields namely tutoring and medical-related systems should be spent a large amount of coffer on. Only by doing so, can the issues of education and healthcare on the planet be completely addressed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, an increasing numbe...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing living standards for peole better. First, it goes without saying that it is...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one nation', 'a nation', or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: one nation; a nation; nations
...n is one of the immense determinants to one nations flourishing. For instance, investing a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 654, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...h is one of the measurements deciding a nations prosperity, splurging money on buying t...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 775, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...poses may bring a wealth of benefits to peoples health conditions. That is not to...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...benefits to peoples health conditions. That is not to say that space travelling...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sia, can afford to fund such programs. In conclusion, I would argue that some p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, nevertheless, so, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31384615385 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03803736085 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590769230769 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2373040917 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.846153846 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215523869113 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694618203487 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573926777184 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134576786687 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663505483297 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.