In the modern age, some people think it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

In the modern age, some people think it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The technology development have change human’s life largely. With the invention of computer and the sharp development of typing technology, people seems have no need to rely on handwriting. And handwriting course are in danger of been removed from children’s education. As for me, I disagree with this standpoint.

First and foremost, handwriting have close relationship with language learning. When kids entering school, speaking and writing are always the first class for students and they are also the basic skill for learner to continue their further study. To practice handwriting can help children to understand letters or words better, and in a long term, to enhance the comprehension toward culture and language. Moreover, a quick and clear handwriting can help children to express their thoughts more easily. Clear writing helps to identify meanings, so writing skill are still useful for learning.

No one will ignore the convenience that brought by typing technology. However using these technics have some limits and disadvantages. Firstly, the computer radiation cause health problems and too much time seeing screen damage people’s eyesight. More importantly, many typing software can correct grammar and spelling mistake so that children will ignore their incorrect using in language if they just learn typing skill. Once a young child established wrong use in writing, it is usually difficult to change. Thus handwriting skill remains essential even in modern age for kids.

In conclusion, fluid handwriting is a basic skill to learning, so it is still necessary for kids to learn this course in today’s world.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 71, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ence that brought by typing technology. However using these technics have some limits a...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 415, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to type'.
Suggestion: to type
...ct using in language if they just learn typing skill. Once a young child established w...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, thus, as for, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55511811024 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93318448229 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629921259843 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2356661725 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1875 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.875 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117957483447 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378841422779 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330952554776 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675498818183 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281556988076 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.