A man without an education, many of us believe, is an unfortunate victim of adverse circumstances, deprived of one of the greatest opportunities. The contrivance of the Internet has greatly revolutionized mode of education. People have been debating for years of the pros and cons of distance learning without reaching any definite agreement. Personally, tele-education does diversify people’s option of acquiring knowledge and enjoy some merits, yet, the benefits are dwarfed by the troubles it brings along.
Seen from the positive aspects, some virtues could be gained via on-line education. First，distance education reduces the need of the presence of teachers, however, widely popularizes exceptional educational resources. More precisely, one can avail himself of rich on-line courses as long as he gets enrolled in the university. Meanwhile, audio and video files can be constantly repeated. Besides, on-line education not only saves the trouble of commuting but also provides flexible way of learning. In this sense, it is especially suitable for special learning group, sick students, disabled self-learners and occupied employees could serve as good examples.
Problems, however, inevitably ensue. Initially, it is highly possible that some young computer learners might fail to excel academically due to the fact that they either indulge in on-line games or are distracted by on-line chat room. This is especially true for those who lack self-disincline. Without the ideal atmosphere created by conventional teaching, plenteous learners might end up losing zeal in learning and becoming lazybones. Also, individual learning experience might make young adults become socially inadequate, even isolated and inferior. The Internet might enact the role of facilitating teaching, yet, only educators could enlighten wisdom, kindle study interest and care for spiritual growth. Eventually，the popularity of distance education is a challenge for learners in those poverty-stricken villages or remote rural areas. Traditional classroom education is, virtually, indispensable for those who lack basic skills of computer.
To conclude, I re-affirm my conviction that online education is only the supplementary tool of conventional education, students ought to receive traditional classroom education.
- Human activity has had negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe that actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both the views and give your opinion? 89
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 90
- Topic Many people say that universities should only offer to young students with high marks others say that they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well Discuss both views and give your own opinions 96
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things.What is your opinion? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.94610778443 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.268111849 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664670658683 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4479475929 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.526315789 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5789473684 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57894736842 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0458091631982 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0140953890356 0.084324248473 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0266161569645 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0242331800758 0.151304729494 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151532613766 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.93 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.