In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?

It is trendy that everyone nowadays is allowed to do many things, ranging from shopping, talking to even working with only the Internet connection, which hinders people to have face-to-face activities. I believe that this tendency brings about both merits and drawbacks.

To begin with, there are some compelling benefits of using the Internet to shop, work and contact. Firstly, since people do not need to transport to different locations in bad weather conditions or traffic congestion, it is much more convenient and hyper-flexible to purchase many things such as clothes, foods with a click. This also means that people could go shopping whenever and wherever they want, even products from foreign nations. Secondly, working at home via the Internet also creates a good opportunity for parents to take care of their offspring and families. This can be explained by parents are able to supervise their children’ activities, therefore, they could prevent their children from overusing smartphones, or playing computer games.

However, shopping and working at home also bring about some permanent drawbacks. In terms of shopping, people take more risks when they shop online. Take buying clothes as an example, instead of touching the material of a dress to know the quality of it, shopping online only allows them to visualize pictures which customers could not evaluate the authentic value of a product. Furthermore, people easily suffer from many psychological illnesses such as autism, depression when they could not communicate with others. For instance, many youngsters tend not to believe the success or real affection because of exposing too much negative information on social media platforms.

In conclusion, although it is undeniable that there are many benefits of using the Internet on daily tasks, I believe that the disadvantages of this trend are inevitable.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40677966102 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81997227081 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606779661017 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3738973227 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.692307692 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236828331125 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819597415597 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658809903743 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137400484691 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057654299977 0.056905535591 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.