In contemporary life, people all over the world can utilize the internet as a helpful tool to go shopping, work, or communicate with others. From my point of view, it is apparent that there are numerous positive aspects, and this trend also brings a negative development.
It is immutably true that the Internet brings people a magnificent evolution with various irrefutable sides. The first one is that individuals can communicate with others in spite of a long distance. In the past, a child studying abroad could not usually talk to his parents, whereas long-distance calls via the Internet have become normal in the present time. In addition, utilizing the Internet can help people protect the environment. The reason is that citizens can stay at home instead of wasting time driving or riding to restaurants or shops to get what they need. That causes a considerable decline not only in the number of personal vehicles but also in emissions.
On the other hand, the revolution of the Internet undoubtedly brings a lot of undesirable aspects to daily life. Firstly, spending hours using electric devices, including laptops or smartphones, has adverse effects on physical health. According to a research carried out by Japanese researchers in 2010, the popularization of high-tech devices has caused an astonishing increase in the number of myopes and people suffering from other eye diseases. On top of that, mental conditions are drastically affected by a lack of face-to-face communication. Nowadays, there are numerous children who have limited communication skills as a consequence of spending whole days using the Internet without talking to anyone. As a result, they are likely to experience severe depression.
To sum up, the positive effects that the Internet brings to people are colossal and undeniable. However, it is also a potential hazard to physical and mental health.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, whereas, in addition, as a result, in spite of, to sum up, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26072607261 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99845109546 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60396039604 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9064947436 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270792600174 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715461034549 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595375458479 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146508413114 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499924148018 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.