More and more people are relying on private cars as their means of transport. Problems and solutions?
These days, it is undeniable that the advent of automobiles brings a lot of conveniences to people’s lives. However, the high relying of people on private cars results in several problems that need to be solved.
As the number of car users increases uncontrollably, many related issues can be anticipated. The first issue worth mentioning is traffic congestion. Indeed, when the investment in transport infrastructure cannot meet the proliferation of private vehicles, traffic jams, especially in rush hours, are inevitable. Being stuck in traffic jams during rush hours makes commuters feel frustrated and get work inefficiency. Secondly, exhaust fumes from cars exert a detrimental effect on not only human health but also the survival of other creatures. Exposure to smoke and dust from means of transport can cause respiratory diseases. Moreover, the emission of carbon dioxide leads to global warming which devastates the natural habitats of wildlife. The massive of plants and animals could be wiped out.
Since such issues are serious, the government and individuals should take steps immediately to address these problems. On the societal level, the government should improve public transportation. In fact, to be packed in cramped and hot buses is the reason why commuters tend to use their own cars. If the authorities could put more resources into enhancing public transport’s quality, people will commute frequently. In addition, policy leaders should raise social awareness of environmental protection. They not only urge but also educate their citizens about the negative impacts of cars’ emissions on the environment. On a personal level, people should share cars together instead of possessing their own car like before. This leads to a decrease not only in the number of cars in roads but also in accidents and traffic jams.
In conclusion, despite a lot of boons accompanied, the overuse of private cars results in many problems. The government and individuals must have the responsibility to mitigate negative effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44339622642 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00595541684 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619496855346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0197314723 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.55 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257192358809 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579571825743 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694102947729 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135941354508 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592679486677 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.