Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, smoking has been receiving a great deal of media attention around the world due to its substantial impacts on human well-being. Whether smoking should be forbad in public areas or not is still in controversy. In my opinion, governments must enact strict laws to put an end to smoking.
It is obvious that the detrimental effects of smoking bring to people’s life and the environment. From the personal aspect, there are a lot of pieces of evidence that smoking increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Smokers inhale the number of toxic chemicals such as nicotine, arsenic, ammonia which cause the number of respiratory diseases or even lung cancer. It has not stopped here, the exhalation of them releases harmful substances sparking off some adverse influences on people who expose. For example, passive smokers also suffer from the same disorders as active smokers, especially, if pregnant women expose to tobacco smoke, their offspring are more likely to be born with birth defects or even die in pregnancy. From the environmental aspect, cigarette smoking triggers environmental pollution by emitting toxic air pollutants into the atmosphere. The cigarette butts also litter the environment, and its residue would seep into the soil or the rivers, causing soil and water pollution respectively. Moreover, the main ingredient of a cigarette is tobacco planted in rainforests, so the more people purchase cigarette packs, the more trees are cut down. This leads to the growth in deforestation, thus contributing to global warming.
However, it is often thought that smoking is a freedom of choice and the government would violate civil rights if they implement the smoking forbidden order. Besides, the tobacco industry revenue is accounted for the lion’s share in the GDP of nations, thus gradually diminishing poverty and enhancing residents’ living standards. These ideas are unconvincing. It is also infringed human’s right as smokers bother people nearby by cigarette’ odor and toxic that has adverse impacts on their health. Even when smokers use their cigarette at the desolate places, it also harms the environment and affects human from over the world. The reason why I disagree with the second opinion is that the budget spent on smoking-related diseases might exceed the profit they gain. Indeed, most respiratory disorders are chronic, so treatment for these diseases usually requires long-term effort and costs a lot of money. People who are suffered from these problems cannot enter the workforce to cover their lives, which becomes a burden on their family members and also the nations’economy.
In conclusion, smoking, today’s alarming problem, brings several demerits to human life. I think the government should immediately enact strict laws to prevent people from smoking. Only by doing so can humans enjoy a healthy life.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
...er, it is often thought that smoking is a freedom of choice and the government would viol...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, thus, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 1615.20841683 151% => OK
No of words: 455.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34505494505 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86172413773 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 176.041082164 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589010989011 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 745.2 506.74238477 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6026048024 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.739130435 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7826086957 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78260869565 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203916487657 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529166645392 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510688675031 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113650826832 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03356274703 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.