More and more people from wealthy countries are spending a short time doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses for communities in poorer countries Why young people choose to do so Who will benefit more young people or the communities

There is an increasing number of children from rich nations providing free-of-cost services to people in deprived countries. These social services play a vital role in bringing in a change in these people’s lives. There are several reasons for performing these activities, like providing a helping hand to needy communities to grow, in poor nations. Also, with such free of cost facilities, both the society and the young individuals get equally benefited.

Young students from developed countries visit poor countries to bring a change in the lives of underprivileged people who cannot fulfill their necessities. These adolescents provide all the essential services, like medical care, free education, and conduct environmental awareness campaigns to provide a platform to these needy people to make their lives better. Not only this support is important to the community but it also raises the standard of living of the local public. For example, many students from the colleges of the United Kingdom visit poor countries to provide free education to disadvantaged children.

These initiatives are equally important to the young children as well as the local community. By providing essential services to needy individuals, students develop various skills, like teamwork. Furthermore, these actions give a purpose to their lives and, they get satisfaction after helping poor people. Similarly, there are multiple benefits to the deprived nations from these subsidized facilities, like new job opportunities, more sources of income. Moreover, people in the community learn to live a civilized life and become independent by earning money with hard work and knowledge.

In a nutshell, with a growing number of juveniles providing support to individuals in poor nations is proven to be beneficial for both the free service providers and the receivers. By providing multiple facilities, children not only support the societies, but they also provide a wide range of opportunities to the citizens to become independent and support their families.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, well, for example, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42038216561 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86986324681 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477707006369 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 314.0 20.2975951904 1547% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1702.0 106.682146367 1595% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 314.0 20.7667163134 1512% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 82.0 7.06120827912 1161% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188761846462 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188761846462 0.084324248473 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126708389741 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678468427673 0.056905535591 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 161.1 13.0946893788 1230% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -264.15 50.2224549098 -526% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 128.1 11.3001002004 1134% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.64 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.03 8.58950901804 268% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 127.6 10.1190380762 1261% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 128.0 10.7795591182 1187% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.