More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering computing and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers arround the world. What is your opinion.
Engineering, computing and medicine are specialist areas which more and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in. For this movement, there are two contrary opinions. Some people think that rich countries are stealing from poor countries, other feel this movement of workers is natural. In my opinion, I totally agree with second statement with following reasons.
Firstly, I personally think that this movement is a common phenomenon in recent years. People to make their life better, especially the talent people. Moving to the wealthy countries, they have opportunities to full fill their profession as well as get job satisfaction and have been offered a high salary. Meanwhile, working and living in poor countries without modern machines and low technical make qualified people unable to practice their knowledge or lift up the skills. Moreover, the life of human in prosperous countries is more comfortable and convenient. These countries have strong economic and financial status. Thus, the government spend plenty of money in essential fields as education, medical system, environment, etc. And it brings pleasant results. But there is always a flip side of the coin. This movement seems the brain draining, it makes the unbalance in a global society. The gap between poor and rich countries will continue to grow exponentially. The poor countries lack human resource, especially skilled workers in several key sector, and this vicious cycle is the technique nd economic undeveloped, the poor get poorer. The negative results such as poverty, criminal or terrorism may affect the other nation directly.
Using human resource effectively is the responsibilities of government. The governments of the less affluent nations creat more job opportunities and pay better salary for skilled workers to encourage them stay in their local countries. Alternatively, the governments of wealth countries should assist poor countries with technology and expert skills or invest in these nation and employ qualified workers. The positive result is good for all.
In conclusion, moving workers from one country to another country is a nation process and the governments play an indispensable role to deal with this issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1149, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nomic undeveloped, the poor get poorer. The negative results such as poverty, crimi...
^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this nation' or 'these nations'?
Suggestion: this nation; these nations
...chnology and expert skills or invest in these nation and employ qualified workers. The posit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4358974359 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88696643665 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.210032727 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7272727273 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9545454545 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379593490589 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925607548152 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131610473628 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236589575673 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.151624113431 0.056905535591 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.