Traffic and housing problems could be solved by moving large companies, factories and their employees to the countryside. Do you agree or disagree?
As countries and big cities become more and more developed, the traffic and accommodation are hard issues because of overcrowed population. Some people think that moving large companies, factories and their employees to the rural is one effective way to tackle these problems. In my opinion, I completely agree with this idea with several reasons.
First of all, the relocation of large business and their staff members from big cities to countryside make traffic congestion be handled. Most people go to work by private vehicle, this lead to overcrowed roads during the peak hours. Moving business and their facilities to rural areas will cause mass quantity of vehicle lower which help traffic-jam reduce.
In addition, the pressure on urban housing supply system will be relieved. Actually, more and more persons from countryside move to big cities for living and working that will result in greater demand for housing. Thus it is likely to push up property prices and rents. Moreover, most of land in cities is used for commercial center, so the land for residential areas is small, many persons live in extremely narrow place. Therefore, moving big companies to rural areas and immigration is significantly reduced cause urban housing no longer be a severe problem.
All in all, I strongly believe that relocating business to the countryside have a powerful impact to deal with traffic and housing problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...companies, factories and their employees to the rural is one effective way to tac...
^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...l result in greater demand for housing. Thus it is likely to push up property prices...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19213973799 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6812796034 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61135371179 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0844155662 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0833333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205749975702 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699837856844 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066210800275 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11658162292 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432803700763 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.