Most high-level positions in companies are filled by men even though the workforce in many developed countries is more than 50 percent female. Companies should be required to allocate a certain percentage of these positions to women. Do you agree?
It is argued that certain percentage of executive roles are needed to be reserved for females in the organisations given that there are more than 50 percent women force in numerous developed countries and majorly males are at the top most positions in many corporations. It is agreed that significant percentage of seats should be assign to ladies in any company. This essay will firstly discuss that the women should be equally paid for the same type of job as a man, and secondly the fact that girls now outperforming the boys in many universities; followed by reasoned conclusion.
Despite years of the same so-called "equal rights" to women in the workplace, they are still continued to be underpaid. Women having equal level of education and doing the same work with more dedication as their male colleagues, earn less money and this is unfair. As an illustration, in the recent study of Times of India it was observed that males earn 19% more as compare to females with same identical roles. However, this may be due to women taking maternity leaves and falling behind males.
This unfairness is compunded by the fact that women now getting higher grades in colleges and universty courses. Even previously in male dominated fields, like law and medicine, females perform outstanding and therefore be awarded with top roles. For example, girls recently outperformed male for the first time in UK law university. Despite this, employers should bear in mind that roles should be assinged on merit basis, rather than on gender.
In conclusion, women do deserve an equal share of good jobs available in market, namely because they are capable of doing the same job as man can do and they achieve higher academic standards than men at university. It is recommended that company should make their hiring practice fairer irrespective of their stereotype thinking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assigned'?
Suggestion: assigned
...gnificant percentage of seats should be assign to ladies in any company. This essay wi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...t was observed that males earn 19% more as compare to females with same identical ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08709677419 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75724190713 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577419354839 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2019423378 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245856940954 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077668644251 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687355934236 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140031057986 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078313237561 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.78957915832 194% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.