As far as we know, Science is one of the most significant key role in daily life and serve us with many prospects. Nevertheless, others claimed that Science should be to improve people's lives instead of concentrating via many other aspects. I agree with this notion and I would outline my reason.
There are many underlying reasons for what science put through the next following years. Some people believe that science should focus on solving practical problems as well as spontaneous risks in surrounded life. For example, The advent of wireless fire warning devices in many tall buildings or skyscrapers, which are one of the most significant impressions, making life better for people, simultaneously, has increased the longevity expectancy for us as well as addressed the limitations that humanity had still not been being to do it for thousand of years.
To be more clarity for this opinion, Many scientific discoveries and advancements have had a direct and positive impacts on people's lives. To be specific, medical science or the innovation of medical methods in treatments and cures for many diseases has still bringing a lot of advantages. This, which has improved the health and well-being countless individuals. Similarity, technological advancements have made many aspects of daily life more ample and convenient.
In conclusion, I would totally side with those who think that Science should prioritise people's lives, because of having a fact that what if would happen there is no human existence, no more evolved organism that can pass down the greatness of a science later.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
As far as we know, Science is one of the...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... notion and I would outline my reason. There are many underlying reasons for wh...
^^
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...y had still not been being to do it for thousand of years. To be more clarity for thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... being to do it for thousand of years. To be more clarity for this opinion, Man...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... daily life more ample and convenient. In conclusion, I would totally side with...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...down the greatness of a science later.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2140077821 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92521615987 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610894941634 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.1606972055 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.818181818 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3636363636 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25722458505 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102053634004 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535798210772 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159261503353 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636253515534 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.