The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Science has frequently been stated to be formed and developed majorly to enhance the life quality of ordinary people rather than for any other purposes. In my eyes, this viewpoint had better be strongly advocated, and I will show my approval of the view in the following essay.
Initially cited to support my notion is the ever-lasting essence of science. Through specific methods, such as observation, measurement and experimentation, it has aligned itself with the natural world owing to studying its structure and operation. Therefore, whatever scientific discoveries researchers may make, they will show their link to people's lives. For instance, some might still doubt how three Newton's laws of motion can be applied. However, possibly to their astonishment, these laws can physically support how virtually every vehicle can move on roads with balance. Science also goes hand in hand with the times, solving theoretical and practical problems of society in each particular period. In this respect, circumstances of epidemics throughout global history can be profound evidence. Without the introduction of vaccines in the 18th century, diseases such as smallpox or the recent COVID-19 pandemic could not be extinguished or at least controlled.
In addition, science's most significant aim is to improve people's lives since its applications can mutually support technology, which has become a crucial part of the human world. We might be proud of cutting-edge technologies and grateful to their inventors, but only a few may know that these inventions could not exist without theoretical scientific knowledge. For instance, X-ray testing is now familiar to citizens in many countries. Nevertheless, if not accidentally discovered in the late 1890s, X-rays might hardly be known and popularly used in medicine.
In conclusion, enhancing the quality of human life should become the most vital purpose of science from my perspective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little may'.
Suggestion: little may
...grateful to their inventors, but only a few may know that these inventions could not ex...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47491638796 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02947640996 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.66220735786 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0479037256 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.133333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161088431468 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464938450773 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535761857515 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103001870589 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.032976993166 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.