Museums and art galleries should show local history and culture instead of work from different countries.
Discuss both views and give opinion.
Nowadays, there has been much discussion revolving around the issue of whether museums and art galleries should exhibit historical and cultural values of their own country or different nations in the world. In my opinion, the local museums and art galleries should concentrate on work from not only their place but also others.
On the one hand, exhibiting artworks which reflect indigenous history and culture is beneficial on different levels. Firstly, it creates favorable conditions for a country to promote citizens’ national pride. This can be explained by the fact that when people pay a visit to museums and art galleries, they are often provided with the opportunity to gain deeper insights into their country’s hard times, crucial historical milestones and victories. This can consequently evoke the feeling of pride and patriotism inside each individual. Secondly, museums and art galleries can act as a spring board for preserving the cultural identity of countries. To be more specific, many traditions and cultures of a nation are being lost due to globalization and migration. Therefore, when we display a country’s artworks in art galleries and museums, visitors coming there can become aware of its traditional and cultural values. As a result, those values can be preserved and a nation’s culture can also be diversified.
On the other hand, the merits of showing other different nations’ history and culture are apparent. Firstly, it can promote global collaboration. The fundamental reason for this is that when people have a chance to expose to the history and culture of other nations, cross-cultural understanding between nations can be facilitated. Moreover, the display of different countries’ historical and cultural values can make museums and art galleries more interesting. As a result, these places will attract a huge influx of tourists, which can lay the foundation for a country’s sustainable economic growth. Thirdly, these museums and art galleries can also benefit students who want to study abroad or people who migrate to other countries greatly. Specifically, they may help them to avoid suffering from culture shocks when moving to a foreign country.
In conclusion, I am firm of the opinion that museums and art galleries had better display the history and culture of both their own country and other foreign countries because of their various aforementioned advantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43535620053 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98210235716 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532981530343 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5155855249 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.444444444 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0555555556 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38888888889 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354085267977 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116326100276 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942804361792 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258271298806 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0849588145751 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.