Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern society, education plays a crucial role in working life. While many people argue that countries should prioritize expenditure on skills and vocational training, I believe that higher education should also be focused on.
On the one hand, it can be argued that people should be equipped with skills and vocational training for actual work. Indeed, those who are provided with skills training can feel more confident in a real working environment. During their training, they seem exposed to simulation scenarios, in which they would have to deal with commonly occurred matters, such as how to talk to a client or collaborate with a colleague. Under guidance, people can know how to effectively solve those situations and apply such techniques later at work. With regard to vocational training, it can facilitate people to adapt quickly to practical work. In fact, vocational trainees tend to be intensively trained in a specific profession area, such as technology, mechanical engineering, which will make them more pragmatic about actual operation. Therefore, skills and vocational training can help increase fresh workers' confidence and adaptability at work.
On the other hand, tertiary education can lead to a competent workforce. Firstly, schooling at a university can furnish students with fundamentals, which will allow them to approach job tasks systematically. Furthermore, in my country, several universities have incorporated skills training into students' curriculum to help them develop into well-rounded employees. Secondly, if people only focus on practical training, they will be insufficient in the essence of knowledge provided by higher education. Thus, those people may have fewer opportunities to climb higher on their corporate ladder, particularly in economic and medicine fields. For that reason, higher schooling can provide people with not only essential knowledge and but skills that can go a long way towards work.
In conclusion, vocational and skills training can be helpful for new employees. However, I believe that tertiary education should receive equal investments due to its long-term benefits.
- People are living longer after they retire What are the problems What can be done to solve the problems 84
- Major cities have become large and overcrowded Why is it happening What measures could be taken to prevent it 84
- The world of work is rapidly changing and people cannot depend on having the same job and working conditions for life What are the causes of this rapid change How can people prepare for their future work life 89
- When cars and cyclists use the same roads there are often problems Why is this the case What are the solutions 84
- Many women are choosing to have children later in life Why is this Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 895, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...tional training can help increase fresh workers confidence and adaptability at work. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61538461538 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00438180982 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563076923077 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7390498716 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.352941176 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1176470588 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3529411765 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212732871849 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812126192972 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549970716199 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148612304271 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324191095165 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.