Major cities have become large and overcrowded. Why is it happening? What measures could be taken to prevent it?
Some metropolises have become sizable and packed with more people. This tendency may result from some reasons, and several measures can be taken to tackle it.
Big cities are often central to the national economy, which can thrive on fully-developed infrastructure. In other words, a number of facilities, such as industrial factories, shopping malls, skyscrapers, and transport systems linking all infrastructure together, are likely to be constructed in a major city to boost its economic development, which will increase the demand for urban expansion. Furthermore, metropolitan regions seem to be considered a dreamland of job prospects, which can attract people from different places. In my country, seasonal jobs in agriculture account for the greatest proportion of suburban workforces. In order to search for more stable employment, people tend to migrate to cities. Therefore, economic growth and residential migration can contribute to more overcrowded and expansive urban areas.
Governments can implement several policies to address this issue. Firstly, municipal authorities should improve their urban planning schemes. In particular, a facility's expansion or construction should be appropriately controlled and licensed to avoid land misuse. In addition, manufacturing companies should be relocated to the suburbs to make room for commercial properties, which require less land but yield the same profits. Secondly, governments should redistribute resources needed for economic development in suburban areas. In fact, regional authorities can facilitate businesses in the countryside with tax exemption, financial packages, which can create more employment opportunities for suburban dwellers. Therefore, better urban construction and regional business encouraging policies can be adopted to control urbanization.
In conclusion, urbanization has become popular in many parts of the world due to economic growth and migration. However, governments' policies can play a vital role in managing this trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03472222222 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26385195015 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645833333333 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1137709484 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.235294118 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.76470588235 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108454002705 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334384805677 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360544311652 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752185270708 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510034405025 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.