The manufacturing and use of cars damages the environment but their popularity is increasing? Why is this? How could this be controlled?
Cars have become one of the most prevalent vehicles in many parts of the world, although the automobile industry can be detrimental to the environment. This trend happens for some reasons, and there are several measures that can be implemented to tackle it.
The proportion of car use has increased due to some causes. Firstly, cars seem more affordable in some markets. In fact, automobiles are marketed at lower prices in countries where cars are manufactured, and there are no import duties levied on them. Thus, more and more people choose such an engined vehicle for their travel. Secondly, city-dwellers tend to prioritize private cars over public transport. As an example, Vietnamese people living in metropolises seem to drive their cars to work rather than take a bus or train since the country's public transportation is poor-quality. Finally, residents seem not to be aware of the adverse effects of cars on the environment. The car industry is so profitable that advertisements about them are rampant on virtually all media of information, such as on television, the Internet; thus, those advertising activities are likely to take the spotlight over environmental protection campaigns. Therefore, cars have gained more popularity due to their affordability, unsatisfying public transport, and ineffective ecological programs.
However, governments can take some steps to tackle the problem. Firstly, national authorities ought to impose heavier ecotaxes on manufacturing and using cars. As a result, cars priced higher can deter people from buying them. Secondly, public transportation may need upgrades and improvements to encourage inhabitants to travel by bus and train systems. Another solution is that state agencies of communications should place restrictions on car advertising at certain periods throughout the day. In addition, governments can raise public awareness by involving residents in more ecological protection programs. By implementing these measures, the popularity of cars can be reduced.
In conclusion, cars are widely used regardless of their negative repercussions on the environment. To curb their increasing widespreadness, governments need to take several prompt actions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27038195029 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57957957958 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.6316769195 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.35 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.65 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205929916957 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652333538287 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486572006082 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129319737259 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223232597494 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.