Some cities create housing for their growing population by providing taller buildings. Other cities create housing by building on wider areas of land. Which solution is better?
In many cities, constructing buildings in response to population growth has become a significant concern. While some metropolises build tower blocks, others opt to use more land for housing. This essay will discuss both solutions.
On the one hand, vertically house building seems suitable for urban areas with limited land. In fact, modern construction techniques can allow humans to create even hundred-story apartment buildings, which can accommodate a number of households. In addition, several flats built on a single floor can be affordable for residents to buy or rent. Simultaneously, by living high from the ground, can citizens be less subjected to noise pollution caused by traffic. However, although almost all high-rise buildings are well-furnished with comfort, residents may have less privacy and access to green space and other communal areas. Indeed, due to the population boom and land scarcity, cities may have to implement further vertical building schemes.
On the other hand, some metropolises create housing on more expansive land areas since much land is available. The reason for this trend can be that authorities may plan to make use of the land and facilitate city-dwellers' access to open space. Moreover, citizens seem to demand spacious houses with more privacy. However, as the population explodes at break-neck speed, available land will be used up. Consequently, the increasing demand for land will pose a threat to natural habitats. In the long run, the exploitation of such habitats will exacerbate environmental issues, such as increased global warming caused by deforestation. Therefore, even though widening houses horizontally can respond to the booming population, this should not be a long-term option.
In conclusion, both architectural solutions can have advantages and disadvantages. Nonetheless, I believe that it is better to inhabit high-rise apartment buildings since this building style can not only house multitudes of people but also reserve lands for further use.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57467532468 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06668691679 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633116883117 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6639407058 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3888888889 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320590664359 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925161943342 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801772004329 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194046366747 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141714529887 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.