When cars and cyclists use the same roads, there are often problems.
Why is this the case?
What are the solutions?
In many parts of the world, cyclists and motorists use the same roads. While this trend can lead to several problems, some measures can be taken to tackle these issues.
One of the major problems that can be caused by cyclists and car drivers sharing a road is traffic congestion. In fact, these two means of transportation tend to move at different speeds, which can be much slower for bicycles than automobiles. Consequently, the two types of vehicles traveling on the same road can result in traffic jams. Another issue is traffic collision. In my country, cyclists hardly wear protectives, which will make them vulnerable to injuries caused by collision with cars. Moreover, people cycling seem to account for the relatively large proportion of accidents when they risk themselves to overtake automobiles even in the absence of space, or motorists may fail to be aware of other road users due to their blind spots. Therefore, sharing the same roads can give rise to traffic jams and accidents.
Some measures can be implemented to address the issues. Firstly, national authorities can adopt several policies to reduce the number of private vehicles. According to that, residents should be encouraged to use public transportation while a bike-sharing scheme can be put into place to create a cyclist-friendly city where people can alternate bike use. In addition, there should be restrictions on cars in the center during peak hours, for example, introducing higher tolls or congestion charges to discourage drivers from entering the densely populated residential areas. Secondly, road safety for cyclists should be improved by state funding. Specifically, governments can invest more in road expansion or separate cycle lane construction. By doing so, potential dangers for road-users can be reduced.
In conclusion, cyclists and car drivers using the same roads can cause some severe issues. Nonetheless, governments can tackle these problems by limiting private transportation means and making roads safer for cyclists.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3855799373 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95618764802 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605015673981 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.9892240514 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4444444444 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1902673416 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720704762188 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684965324537 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145298277055 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456347621081 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.